1976 Nissan Cedric vs. 2000 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2000 Smart Roadster is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart Roadster (101 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Nissan Cedric (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Nissan Cedric | 2000 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Cedric | Roadster |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2370 mm |