1976 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1976 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo C70 (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | C70 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1840 mm |