1976 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1976 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (174 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Nissan Cedric. (147 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Cedric | Civic |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |