1976 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Nissan Cedric (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1976 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2490 mm |