1976 Nissan Laurel vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 1,990 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Laurel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1976 Nissan Laurel. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1976 Nissan Laurel.
Because 1976 Nissan Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (176 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Nissan Laurel. (169 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Nissan Laurel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Nissan Laurel | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Laurel | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 169 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2685 mm |
