1976 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1976 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1976 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1976 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1976 NSU Ro 80.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 NSU Ro 80. (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1976 NSU Ro 80 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | NSU | Volvo |
Model | Ro 80 | 140 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2390 cc | 2127 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 162 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 60 L |