1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1989 Plymouth Laser
To start off, 1989 Plymouth Laser is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1989 Plymouth Laser. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1989 Plymouth Laser.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Plymouth Laser. (142 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Plymouth Laser.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1989 Plymouth Laser | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Plymouth |
Model | Cutlass | Laser |
Year Released | 1976 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 1755 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2480 mm |