1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada
To start off, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada (374 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Oldsmobile Bravada | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
Model | Cutlass | Bravada |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 374 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2880 mm |