1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Honda |
Model | Cutlass | CR-V |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |