1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Cadillac |
Model | Cutlass | ATS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 268 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2776 mm |