1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2013 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2013 Lincoln MKS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lincoln MKS (360 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2013 Lincoln MKS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lincoln MKS (475 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (251 Nm). This means 2013 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2013 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Lincoln |
Model | Cutlass | MKS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3344 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 360 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 5222 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1565 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2868 mm |