1976 Opel Ascona vs. 2009 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Renault Clio is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Clio weights approximately 268 kg more than 1976 Opel Ascona.
Because 1976 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Opel Ascona | 2009 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Ascona | Clio |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1218 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2580 mm |