1976 Opel Ascona vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,366 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo weights approximately 205 kg more than 1976 Opel Ascona.
Because 1976 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Opel Ascona | 2010 Alfa Romeo MiTo | |
Make | Opel | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Ascona | MiTo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2520 mm |