1976 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 5,902 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Plymouth Valiant | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
| Make | Plymouth | Suzuki |
| Model | Valiant | Reno |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5902 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
