1976 Pontiac Grand Safari vs. 2000 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corona is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Pontiac Grand Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Pontiac Grand Safari would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Pontiac Grand Safari is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Pontiac Grand Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Pontiac Grand Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Pontiac Grand Safari | 2000 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
Model | Grand Safari | Corona |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |