1976 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 2003 Toyota Echo
To start off, 2003 Toyota Echo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Echo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Echo. (157 Nm). This means 1976 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Echo.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Pontiac Trans Am | 2003 Toyota Echo | |
Make | Pontiac | Toyota |
Model | Trans Am | Echo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6556 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 434 Nm | 157 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 84.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2590 mm |