1976 Renault 15 vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault 15 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Mustang (315 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1976 Renault 15. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Renault 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 638 kg more than 1976 Renault 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Mustang (440 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Renault 15. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Renault 15.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Renault 15 | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | 15 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1289 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 98 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1603 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |