1976 Renault Rodeo vs. 2002 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2002 Holden Monaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Holden Monaro weights approximately 922 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2002 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Renault Rodeo | 2002 Holden Monaro | |
| Make | Renault | Holden |
| Model | Rodeo | Monaro |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 845 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1602 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |
