1976 Renault Rodeo vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Renault Rodeo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Smart Fortwo weights approximately 140 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1976 Renault Rodeo has manual transmission. 1976 Renault Rodeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Renault Rodeo | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Renault | Smart |
Model | Rodeo | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1867 mm |