1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2004 Volvo V40
To start off, 2004 Volvo V40 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 874 kg more than 2004 Volvo V40.
Because 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2004 Volvo V40 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
Model | Silver Shadow | V40 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 169 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 60 L |