1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 154 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Mitsubishi |
Model | Silver Shadow | Pajero |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 105 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 71 L |