1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 516 kg more than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2005 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Silver Shadow | Phantom |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 6748 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 454 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 84.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2154 kg | 2670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 5840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 15.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 100 L |