1976 Rover 2000 vs. 2004 TVR T 350
To start off, 2004 TVR T 350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,605 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 TVR T 350 (346 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 204 more horse power than 1976 Rover 2000. (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1976 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rover 2000 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2004 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 TVR T 350 (393 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Rover 2000. (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2004 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Rover 2000 | 2004 TVR T 350 | |
Make | Rover | TVR |
Model | 2000 | T 350 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 3605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 272 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2370 mm |