1976 Rover 2000 vs. 2008 Toyota RunX
To start off, 2008 Toyota RunX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rover 2000 weights approximately 232 kg more than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Because 1976 Rover 2000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Rover 2000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota RunX. (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1976 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Rover 2000 | 2008 Toyota RunX | |
Make | Rover | Toyota |
Model | 2000 | RunX |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3532 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 272 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.1 mm | 71.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1332 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2610 mm |