1976 Seat 131 vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 138 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1976 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Seat 131 (178 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1976 Seat 131 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Seat 131 | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Seat | Holden |
Model | 131 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 178 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2685 mm |