1976 Simca 1100 vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Simca 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Simca 1100 would be higher. At 1,091 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 ZAZ Wagon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 ZAZ Wagon (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1976 Simca 1100. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 ZAZ Wagon should accelerate faster than 1976 Simca 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Simca 1100 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Simca 1100 | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
Make | Simca | ZAZ |
Model | 1100 | Wagon |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 944 cc | 1091 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3950 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2330 mm |