1976 Simca 2 Litres vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Simca 2 Litres. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Simca 2 Litres would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Simca 2 Litres. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1976 Simca 2 Litres has manual transmission. 1976 Simca 2 Litres will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Simca 2 Litres | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Simca | Ford |
| Model | 2 Litres | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1981 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |
