1976 Subaru 1400 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Subaru 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Subaru 1400 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1976 Subaru 1400 has manual transmission. 1976 Subaru 1400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Subaru 1400 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Subaru | Mazda |
| Model | 1400 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1361 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
