1976 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1171 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Suzuki Fronte | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
Model | Fronte | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1976 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 356 cc | 3960 cc |
Horse Power | 33 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 545 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |