1976 Suzuki Fronte vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1563 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (236 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Suzuki Fronte | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Suzuki | Jeep |
| Model | Fronte | Commander |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Size | 356 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 42 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 480 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3000 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1300 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 30 L | 80 L |
