1976 Suzuki LJ 20 vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 1,591 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Cee'd (120 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Cee'd (154 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Suzuki LJ 20 | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Suzuki | Kia |
| Model | LJ 20 | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 359 cc | 1591 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 27 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 37 Nm | 154 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
