1976 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (67 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Suzuki | Ford |
Model | LJ 50 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 797 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 40 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2490 mm |