1976 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 639 kg more than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C3 (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Suzuki | Citroen |
| Model | LJ 50 | C3 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 539 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 695 kg | 1334 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3280 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1940 mm | 2550 mm |
