1976 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Suzuki | Citroen |
| Model | LJ 50 | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 539 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
