1976 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 317 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (40 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden UTE. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 449 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (81 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | LJ 50 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 797 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 40 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
