1976 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Honda Ridgeline
To start off, 2010 Honda Ridgeline is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Ridgeline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Ridgeline weights approximately 1093 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2010 Honda Ridgeline is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Ridgeline will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Honda Ridgeline has automatic transmission and 1976 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1976 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Honda Ridgeline will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Toyota Celica | 2010 Honda Ridgeline | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Celica | Ridgeline |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 3110 mm |
