1976 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2010 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover LR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 1621 kg more than 1976 Toyota Celica.
Because 2010 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Land Rover LR4 has automatic transmission and 1976 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1976 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Land Rover LR4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Toyota Celica | 2010 Land Rover LR4 | |
Make | Toyota | Land Rover |
Model | Celica | LR4 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1968 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 2646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1915 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1887 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2885 mm |