1976 Toyota Mark II vs. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (190 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 395 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1997 Chevrolet Camaro (305 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1997 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Toyota Mark II | 1997 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Toyota | Chevrolet |
Model | Mark II | Camaro |
Year Released | 1976 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 170 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2570 mm |