1976 Toyota Mark II vs. 2002 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2002 Honda CR-V is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1976 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Honda CR-V weights approximately 283 kg more than 1976 Toyota Mark II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Toyota Mark II. (170 Nm). This means 2002 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Toyota Mark II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Toyota Mark II | 2002 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Toyota | Honda |
| Model | Mark II | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1988 cc | 2359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 107 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1478 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2630 mm |
