1976 Triumph Stag vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1976 Triumph Stag is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Triumph Stag (143 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Triumph Stag weights approximately 195 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Triumph Stag (234 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1976 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Triumph Stag | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Triumph | Volvo |
| Model | Stag | 220 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 234 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |
