1976 Triumph TR6 vs. 2010 Audi Q5
To start off, 2010 Audi Q5 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Triumph TR6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Triumph TR6 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Triumph TR6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi Q5 (138 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1976 Triumph TR6. (104 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1976 Triumph TR6.
Because 2010 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Triumph TR6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi Q5 (320 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Triumph TR6. (194 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Triumph TR6.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Triumph TR6 | 2010 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Triumph | Audi |
Model | TR6 | Q5 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 194 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 75 L |