1976 TVR 3000 vs. 2010 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac DTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 798 kg more than 1976 TVR 3000.
Because 1976 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac DTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac DTS has automatic transmission and 1976 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1976 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac DTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 TVR 3000 | 2010 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | TVR | Cadillac |
Model | 3000 | DTS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2994 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2936 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 68 L |