1976 TVR M vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR M would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1976 TVR M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 TVR M | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | TVR | Cadillac |
| Model | M | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1599 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 895 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
