1976 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,043 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1976 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1976 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Volkswagen Polo | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Volkswagen | Nissan |
| Model | Polo | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1043 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 68 HP |
| Top Speed | 135 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2360 mm |
