1976 Volvo 240 vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (176 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240.
Because 1976 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Volvo 240 | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Volvo | Acura |
Model | 240 | TL |
Year Released | 1976 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2840 mm |