1976 Volvo 240 vs. 2000 Daihatsu YRV
To start off, 2000 Daihatsu YRV is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daihatsu YRV (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 240 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2000 Daihatsu YRV.
Because 2000 Daihatsu YRV is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 240. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daihatsu YRV will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daihatsu YRV. (120 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1976 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daihatsu YRV.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Volvo 240 | 2000 Daihatsu YRV | |
Make | Volvo | Daihatsu |
Model | 240 | YRV |
Year Released | 1976 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1340 kg | 890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2360 mm |