1976 Volvo 66 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2001 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForFour (74 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Smart ForFour weights approximately 145 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Volvo 66 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Volvo | Smart |
| Model | 66 | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
