1976 Volvo 66 vs. 2013 Nissan Z
To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Z weights approximately 753 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Volvo 66 | 2013 Nissan Z | |
| Make | Volvo | Nissan |
| Model | 66 | Z |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 327 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1573 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4246 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1845 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1326 mm |
