1976 Zastava 1300 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 301 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 1300. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Zastava 1300 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Zastava | Holden |
Model | 1300 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 93 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |