1976 Zastava 2101 vs. 2012 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 408 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 408 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 2101.
Because 1976 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 408 (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Zastava 2101. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Zastava 2101.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Zastava 2101 | 2012 Peugeot 408 | |
| Make | Zastava | Peugeot |
| Model | 2101 | 408 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1587 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1815 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2710 mm |
